How should you assess for a leak in a chest tube drainage system
Review Article Show
IntroductionThe most frequent complication following a pulmonary resection is an alveolar air leak (1). Approximately 30–50% of patients present with one postoperatively and are the most important determinant of length of hospital stay (LOS) (1,2). A few hours postoperatively, some air leaks spontaneously resolve but others can last for many days. In approximately 8–15% of patients, an air leak can last longer than 5 days which is considered a prolonged air leak (PAL) by definition of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (1-3). A PAL complicates postoperative recovery with associated poorer outcomes and increased morbidity (1,3). Factors associated with increased hospital costs and length of stay after a pulmonary resection are PALs, inadequate pain management and postoperative chest tube duration (2). There is increased pressure by hospitals and insurance companies to standardize care and optimize post-operative recovery. Digital chest drainage systems provide continuous monitoring of air leak flow that provides quantifiable, reproducible and objective data (2). Evaluating the air leak flow can allow clinicians to more rapidly differentiate between patients with indications of a PAL and those who may benefit from fast-tracked care (2,4). In contrast, the traditional chest drainage system air leak assessment is instantaneous and subjective by observing the water seal column for bubbling. In the traditional system, suction is obtained from the wall and the degree of negative pressure may vary from the set level due to the fluid in the tubing and where the drainage system is placed in relation to the patient (5). The aim of this paper is to evaluate two different chest drainage systems with air leak management after pulmonary resections and identify gaps in the research that could help standardize postoperative care. MethodsFive databases were used in this search: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, European Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery Journals and U.S. National Library of Medicine. The search terms used were: air leak, digital and thoracic surgery. These three words were used in each of the databases searched. There was no modification necessary for the individual databases. Articles were included if they addressed air leak evaluation with the different chest drainage systems. Either independently evaluating the air leak with one drainage system or comparing the two devices was allowed. The drainage systems had to be evaluated on post-operative thoracic surgical patients. The articles were peer-reviewed, in English and published from 2002 to 2017. Articles were excluded if they were review, commentary or editorial articles. Air leaks due to medical reasons such as: tracheobronchial stenosis, bronchopleural fistula and spontaneous pneumothorax were left out. Air leak evaluation using different intra-operative tissue sealants, suction versus water seal, endobronchial valve implantation, how many chest tubes used after surgery and evaluation of postoperative air leaks that did not include the chest drainage systems were discarded. Different types of surgical technique (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs. open lobectomies) used to evaluate air leaks were also excluded. Search resultsDatabase searches returned 277 articles, and all were screened to determine their relevancy. Thirteen were duplicates and removed. Another 225 articles were excluded after abstract review revealed they did not meet inclusion or met exclusion criteria. Full review was completed on 39 articles and 18 of those were included in the final analysis. Synthesis of the researchChest drainage systems differ with regard to the information produced for clinicians. Management of air leaks after pulmonary resections can vary depending on physician preference and scientific data. Many factors influence the decision to remove chest tubes and how PALs are evaluated and managed. These factors greatly influence hospital length of stay, postoperative pain and number of chest tube days. Apical spaces and PALs after a pulmonary resectionAfter a pulmonary lobectomy, an expected finding is a postresection apical space. This residual space does not have clinical significance unless the patient is symptomatic (1). Upper lobectomies have a higher incidence of air space problems than other lobar resections. Initially after surgery, the remaining lung tissue does not fill the pleural space volume and match the hemithorax shape (1,6). Physiological changes that occur to fill the space are shift of the mediastinum, diaphragm elevation, ipsilateral lung hyperinflation and narrowing of the intercostal spaces (1,6). Many factors contribute to the size of an air leak such as the condition of the lung parenchyma and position of the chest tube (7). Risk factors for a PAL include: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bilobectomy, upper lobectomy, diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) less than 80% predicted and steroid use (3,8). Postoperative air leaks are not just an annoyance that prolongs hospitalization; they can be a surrogate marker for increased morbidity and complications like postoperative atrial fibrillation and pneumonia (9). The LOS averages 5 to 13 days with a PAL since most patients remain in the hospital until the air leak resolves (8,10). Only a small percentage of patients can be discharged from the hospital and go home with a portable chest drainage system (10). The potential complications from a PAL include pneumonia, atelectasis, empyema and longer chest tube days (2,8,11). Digital chest drainage systemsDigital chest drainage systems have also provided a much more accurate air leak reading. These systems provide quantifiable information and continuous monitoring of postoperative air leak flow rates (5,10,11). Digital systems provide reproducible data, eliminate subjective interpretation, decrease interobserver variability, and increase observer agreement rates for chest tube removal (5,10,11). The digital system works by maintaining the intrapleural pressure at a steady level within 0.1 cmH2O. Maintaining a consistent pressure with minimal oscillations, may promote the sealing of air leaks (5). The regulated suction adjusts according to the condition or need in the pleural cavity. The device will apply suction to keep the pleural cavity at the present level. If the patient does have an air leak with suction, the device will intermittently apply suction to restabilize the pleural space according to the degree of the air leak (12). Thopaz (Medela®, Baar, Switzerland), a digital chest drainage system recommends removal of the chest tube when air leak flow is less than 50 mm/min without large variation for the prior 6–12 hours. Interobserver variabilityThe digital system has demonstrated decreased interobserver variability when deciding to remove chest tubes. It objectifies much of the subjective information and can be replicated among several observers (9). The level of agreement significantly increased in nurses, surgeons and residents (11,13-15). This system enables the health care team, regardless of their experience or level of education, to accurately report the status a patient’s air leak (9,14). There is interobserver variability and assessment with a traditional system can be error prone (9,14). With differing opinions among clinicians and the inability to accurately ascertain an improving air leak, can lead to longer chest tube days and increased LOS. If chest tubes are removed prematurely because of an inaccurate reading, there may be a subsequent need for chest tube reinsertion (14). Gap analysisIn the majority of the research studies there were inconsistent airflow rates in the digital drainage system or a dedicated number of hours before chest tubes were removed. Table 1 provides eight studies and their flow threshold for chest tube removal with the Thopaz® digital system after a pulmonary resection which shows wide variation when chest tubes are removed. Table 1 Thopaz airflow threshold for chest tube removal Full tableAfter a pulmonary resection, there is no agreement in the number of chest tubes, whether suction should or should not be used or if chest tubes should be clamped before removal (10,13,14). Variation in clinical practice is an important determinant that can lengthen hospital stay. Improving and maintaining consistency in air leak assessment can lead to a more timely removal of chest tubes with a shorter LOS. The wide variation in air leak flow in the digital systems before removal adds to the complication of chest tube management. Currently there have been no studies evaluating robotic-assisted pulmonary resections and air leak assessment with the digital or traditional chest drainage systems. Robotic surgery uses 3-dimensional, high-definition visualization allowing surgeons to intuitively perform complex resections (23). The accuracy and advanced imaging provided by the daVinci® robot offsets the reduced tactile feedback missing in robotic surgery (23). Evaluating the traditional and digital chest drainage systems with robotic surgery would provide more information for the thoracic surgery team, using a different surgical approach, to assist in patient care postoperatively. In the digital drainage system, implementing a consistent and reliable flow level for a specified time that could be used by all surgeons would remove all the variations that currently exist. These recommendations could only be implemented if surgeons removed their opinions and supported the scientific research. Future researchThere has been a lot of research with the new technology in chest drainage systems. There is much more to be examined to translate the research into practice and incorporate new standards of care. Practice
Research
Once this research is complete, chest tube management will have less variation with either the digital or traditional chest drainage systems. Clinicians will be more educated on air leaks and how to efficiently and safely care for patients postoperatively. AcknowledgementsNone. Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. References
Cite this article as: Baringer K, Talbert S. Chest drainage systems and management of air leaks after a pulmonary resection. J Thorac Dis 2017;9(12):5399-5403. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.15 How do you assess air leaks in a chest tube?Determination of the Presence of an Air Leak
To quantify the amount of air leak in a patient connected to a chest tube, the patient is asked to cough, and the water column and the water seal column in the chest tube drainage system are observed. If there are no air bubbles, the pleural cavity is devoid of air.
When should the nurse check for leaks in the chest tube?Observe the integrity of the drainage tubing and chest tube every 2 to 4 hours as well as with a change in the patient's condition to ensure that the system is intact, with no air leaks, and to help prevent kinks or clots from forming.
What should be assessed on a patient with a chest tube?At least every 2 hours, document a comprehensive pulmonary assessment, including respiratory rate, work of breathing, breath sounds, and arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2).
What assessments do you need to carry out when assessing a chest drain?Bubbling and swinging should be assessed with the patient deep breathing and if possible coughing. This also has the benefit of assessing adequacy of analgesia. These features indicate that the drain is still functioning. Absence of swinging indicates that the drain is occluded or is no longer in the pleural space.
|