Lỗi access violation at address 00550c20 in module icsys.ico.exe

By portable app, I'm assuming you mean a single .exe file, to which the answer is no. You could make one from the source, but it will launch very slowly due to the way node-webkit handles dependency extraction within a single file.

You could also run Fenix from the source. Even though you're on Windows, the instructions for running on Linux will help you run the app from the source code.

  • Quote

by sontle » Mon Oct 22, 2018 9:33 am

Hi, We are using IA8 as our development tool. It has been working fine in our Windows 7 environment. However, we just migrated to Windows 10 and the tool is now consistently giving us the above error. It worked for few times then the error happen again. That is the from the UI, from command line, it crash every time. We are stuck right now, please advice.

Welcome to Autodesk’s Installation and Licensing Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Download, Installation, and Licensing topics.

Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

Show only | Search instead for

Did you mean:

  • Back to Topic Listing
  • Previous
  • Next

1278 Views, 8 Replies

‎03-12-2021 03:45 AM

Access violation at address 01504207 in module 'SBD.exe'. Read of address 00000000

I keep receiving this error when I click on the "structure loads" tab.

Once the error pops up, I cannot proceed using the program.

Does anyone know how to rectify this issue?

I am using version 20.2.140.0.

  • Back to Topic Listing
  • Previous
  • Next

8 REPLIES 8

‎03-12-2021 06:10 AM

Hi Michael

Does this error occur with a particular file? If so please zip and attach so that we can investigate.

Thanks

Simon

Simon Hooper Software Development

‎03-12-2021 07:35 AM

Hi Michael

Thanks for the file. The problem seems to be in the definition of the longitudinal beams....I will see if I can repair.

Simon Hooper Software Development

‎03-12-2021 07:43 AM

Here is a version with the longitudinal beams cleared out. I no longer get the AV. You probably don't need to redefine the longitudinal beams in this non-standard grillage.

Simon Hooper Software Development

‎03-12-2021 07:54 AM

I attach the details of the original longitudinal beam elements in case needed [with the data in error removed]

Simon Hooper Software Development

‎03-12-2021 08:11 AM

We have put in a fix to soon to be released version to stop the AV. Note that there was reference to a zero length member [which doesn't seem to exist]...

Chủ Đề