What fiber is produced in excess in scleroderma patients and what are the results
The term scleroderma is derived from the Greek words skleros (hard or indurated) and derma (skin) and it is used to describe a disease characterized by progressive skin hardening and induration. Scleroderma is an aspect of systemic sclerosis, a systemic connective tissue disease that also involves subcutaneous tissue, muscles, and internal organs. Show
Diagnosis is based on clinical manifestations, but tests and procedures may be used initiallly to exclude alternative diagnoses, and later for assessment of organ involvement and monitoring of disease progression (see Presentation and Workup). Treatment is directed principally toward managing complications and providing symptomatic relief, but disease-modifying agents are under investigation (see Treatment and Medication). Next: BackgroundDefinitionThe term systemic sclerosis is used to describe a systemic autoimmune disease of unknown origin characterized by excessive deposition of collagen and other connective tissue macromolecules in skin and multiple internal organs, prominent and often severe fibroproliferative alterations in the microvasculature, and numerous humoral and cellular immunologic abnormalities. Although systemic sclerosis is not inherited, a genetic predisposition plays an important role in its development. Systemic sclerosis is a complex and heterogeneous disease with clinical forms ranging from limited skin involvement (limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis) to forms with diffuse skin sclerosis and severe and often progressive internal organ involvement (diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis), and occasionally a fulminant course (fulminant systemic sclerosis). Limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis involves areas distal to the elbows and knees but may involve the face and neck. CREST syndrome (calcinosis, Raynaud phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, and telangiectasias—although not all are needed for the disorder to be called CREST) is an older term used to describe this subset of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis refers to skin thickening affecting the trunk and the skin of the extremities proximal to the elbows and knees besides involvement of the face. There are rare cases of typical systemic sclerosis internal organ involvement in the absence of clinically apparent cutaneous involvement, a clinical subset known as “scleroderma sine scleroderma”. Systemic sclerosis involvement is most obvious in the skin; however, the gastrointestinal tract as well as the respiratory, renal, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, endocrine, and genitourinary systems are frequently involved. In 2013, a joint committee of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) published a revised classification criteria for systemic sclerosis [1, 2] to improve the sensitivity of the widely used previous classification criteria. The revised criteria for the classification of systemic sclerosis are listed in Table I, below. Table. (Open Table in a new window) Table 1: ACR/EULAR Revised Systemic Sclerosis Classification Criteria Item Sub-item(s) Score* Skin thickening of the fingers of both hands extending proximally to the metacarpophalangeal joints (presence of this criterion is sufficient criterion for SSc classification) None 9 Skin thickening of the fingers (count the higher score only) Puffy fingers 2 Sclerodactyly (distal to the metacarpophalangeal joints but proximal to the proximal interphalangeal joints) 4 Fingertip lesions (count the higher score only) Digital tip ulcers 2 Fingertip pitting scars 3 Telangiectasia None 2 Abnormal nailfold capillaries None 2 Pulmonary arterial hypertension and/or interstitial lung disease (maximum score is 2) Pulmonary arterial hypertension 2 Interstitial lung disease 2 Raynaud phenomenon None 3 Systemic sclerosis–related autoantibodies (maximum score is 3) Anticentromere 3 Anti–topoisomerase I 3 Anti–RNA polymerase III 3 *The total score is determined by adding the maximum score in each category. Patients with a total score equal to or greater than 9 are classified as having definite systemic sclerosis (modified from van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. Nov 2013;65(11):2737-47. [1] ) Historical backgroundHippocrates first described this condition as thickened skin. [3, 4] In 1836, Giovambattista Fantonetti used for the first time the term “skleroderma generale” to describe a patient with dark leather-like skin who exhibited a loss of range of joint motion caused by skin tightening. [5] Robert H. Goetz introduced the concept of scleroderma as a systemic disease in 1945 and coined the term progressive systemic sclerosis to emphasize the systemic and often progressive nature of the disease. [6] The purpose of classification criteria is to enroll a uniform population of patients in research studies and it is based on various parameters that are commonly used for systemic sclerosis diagnosis. It is important to emphasize that these criteria are not diagnostic criteria and are not applicable to patients with scleroderma-like disorders or to patients with skin thickening sparing the fingers. Previous Next: PathophysiologySystemic sclerosis is a systemic disease that besides the skin affects numerous organ systems. The pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis is complex. [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14] Increasing evidence suggests interaction between environmental and genetic factors, with a regulatory epigenetic mechanism involving changes in the expression of DNA and microRNA. [15] The clinical and pathologic manifestations result from three distinct processes: 1) severe fibroproliferative vascular lesions of small arteries and arterioles, 2) excessive and often progressive deposition of collagen and other extracellular matrix (ECM) macromolecules in skin and various internal organs, and 3) alterations of humoral and cellular immunity. It is not clear which of these processes is of primary importance or how they are temporally related during the development and progression of the disease. Numerous studies have suggested a sequence of pathogenetic events initiated by unknown etiologic factors in a genetically receptive host, which trigger microvascular injury characterized by structural and functional endothelial cell abnormalities. The endothelial cell abnormalities result in either increased production and release of numerous and potent mediators including cytokines, chemokines, polypeptide growth factors, and various other substances such as prostaglandins, reactive oxygen species (ROS), or in the reduction of important compounds such as prostacyclin and nitric oxide. The endothelial cell dysfunction allows the chemokine- and cytokine-mediated attraction of inflammatory cells and fibroblast precursors (fibrocytes) from the bloodstream and bone marrow and their transmigration into the surrounding tissues, resulting in the establishment of a chronic inflammatory process with participation of macrophages and T and B lymphocytes, with further production and secretion of cytokines and growth factors from these cells. The immunological alterations include innate immunity abnormalities, tissue infiltration with macrophages and T and B lymphocytes; production of numerous disease-specific autoantibodies; and dysregulation of cytokine, chemokine, and growth factor production. The released cytokines and growth factors induce the activation and phenotypic conversion of various cellular types, including resident fibroblasts, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and pericytes into activated myofibroblasts, the cells ultimately responsible for initiation and establishment of the fibrotic process. This sequence of events (see diagram below) results in the development of a severe and often progressive fibroproliferative vasculopathy, and exaggerated and widespread accumulation of fibrotic tissue, the hallmark of the fibrotic process characteristic of the disease. Overall scheme illustrating a current understanding of SSc pathogenesis. Hypothetical sequence of events involved in tissue fibrosis and fibroproliferative vasculopathy in SSc. An unknown causative agent induces activation of immune and inflammatory cells in genetically predisposed hosts resulting in chronic inflammation. Activated inflammatory and immune cells secrete cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors which cause fibroblast activation, differentiation of endothelial and epithelial cells into myofibroblasts, and recruitment of fibrocytes from the bone marrow and the peripheral blood circulation. The activated myofibroblasts produce exaggerated amounts of ECM resulting in tissue fibrosis.View Media Gallery The vascular alterations preferentially affect small arteries and arterioles. Vascular dysfunction is one of the earliest alterations of systemic sclerosis. Severe alterations in small blood vessels of skin and internal organs, including endothelial dysfunction, subendothelial fibrosis, and perivascular cellular infiltration with activated T cells and macrophages, are almost universally present in systemic sclerosis affected tissues. [9] Recent evidence supports the concept that endothelial dysfunction and fibrosis are closely related phenomena and it has been suggested that the vascular alterations, including the phenotypic conversion of endothelial cells into activated mesenchymal myofibroblasts, may be the initiating event and the common pathogenetic alteration leading to the fibrotic and chronic inflammatory involvement of multiple organs. [9, 10] The activation of endothelial cells induces the expression of chemokines and cell adhesion molecules, causes the attraction, transendothelial migration, and perivascular accumulation of immunologic-inflammatory cells, including T- and B-lymphocytes and macrophages. The inflammatory cells produce and secrete a variety of cytokines and/or growth factors including transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and other profibrotic mediators such as endothelin-1, which induce increased proliferation of smooth muscle cells, marked accumulation of subendothelial fibrotic tissue, and initiation of platelet aggregation and intravascular thrombosis, eventually causing microvascular occlusion. The fibrotic process is characterized by the excessive production and deposition of types I, III, and VI collagens and other ECM and connective tissue macromolecules including COMP, glycosaminoglycans, tenascin, and fibronectin. [11, 12] This crucial component results from the accumulation in skin and other affected tissues of myofibroblasts, cells possessing unique biological functions, including increased production of fibrillar type I and type III collagens, expression of α-smooth muscle actin, and reduction in the expression of genes encoding ECM–degradative enzymes. Thus, the accumulation of myofibroblasts in affected tissues and the uncontrolled persistence of their elevated biosynthetic functions are crucial determinants of the extent and rate of progression of the fibrotic process in systemic sclerosis. The immunologic alterations include the production of numerous autoantibodies, some with very high specificity for the disease, as well as abnormalities in the innate and acquired cellular immune responses. [13, 14] The exaggerated connective tissue production by systemic sclerosis fibroblasts is induced by cytokines and growth factors released from the tissue-infiltrating inflammatory cells. One of the growth factors that plays a crucial role in the fibrosis that accompanies systemic sclerosis is TGF-β. One of the most important effects of TGF-β is the stimulation of ECM synthesis by stimulating the production of various collagens and other ECM proteins. [11, 12] Besides its potent ECM stimulatory effects, TGF-β also induces the generation of myofibroblasts and decreases the production of collagen-degrading metalloproteinases. TGF-β also stimulates the production of protease inhibitors, which prevent ECM breakdown. Previous Next: EtiologyThe exact etiology of systemic sclerosis is not known. Systemic sclerosis is not inherited, although a genetic predisposition plays an important role in its development. Environmental factors (eg, triggers or accelerators) may contribute to the development of systemic sclerosis in the proper genetic background. [16, 17, 18, 19, 20] These include the following:
Case reports describe the development of scleroderma in patients treated with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab for metastatic melanoma. [21] Cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus 5, and parvovirus B19 have been proposed as viral accelerating factors. However, evidence of their involvement is inconclusive. [22] Previous Next: EpidemiologyUnited States statisticsThe estimated incidence of systemic sclerosis in the United States is 20 cases per million population, and its prevalence has been estimated at 276 cases per million population, although the reported prevalence varies depending on the methodology used and the targeted population. [23, 24, 25] An increased systemic sclerosis incidence and prevalence has been evident in the last 50 years. Although improved diagnosis and increased survival rate can partially account for this observation, it appears that there has been a real increase in its incidence. International statisticsSystemic sclerosis occurs worldwide, although its reported prevalence varies significantly in different countries; for example, higher prevalence rates are reported in Europe and North and South America than in East Asia. [24, 25, 26, 27] Obtaining an exact estimate of prevalence is difficult because systemic sclerosis is frequently misdiagnosed. Furthermore, ethnic and geographical clustering may contribute to the variability in terms of frequency. However, it appears that there is higher frequency among black individuals. [28, 29, 30, 31] RaceSystemic sclerosis affects individuals of all races. [28, 29, 30, 31] However, incidence rates, severity and mortality may vary among ethnic groups. Recent studies have documented a higher general and age-specific incidence rate in blacks than in whites. It has also been shown that affected African Americans develop more severe disease and have poorer outcomes when compared with other ethnic groups. [28, 29, 30, 31] The highest prevalence of systemic sclerosis in the US is among the Oklahoma Choctaw Indians. The prevalence in the Choctaws is 469 cases per 100,000 population, which is higher than in non-full blood Choctaw (31 per 100,000) and 20 times higher than the national average. [32] Similarly, a prevalence rate of 47 per 100,000 has been found in the indigenous peoples in Canada. [25] Sex- and age-related disparitiesThe risk of systemic sclerosis is 4-9 times higher in women than in men. [23, 24, 25] However, the mechanisms responsible for the disproportionately higher frequency in females have not been elucidated. A multicenter cohort of 2281 patients from the Italian Systemic sclerosis PRogression INvestiGation (SPRING) registry documented an overall female/male ratio of 8.2:1. Males were found to have a shorter time from onset of Raynaud phenomenon to systemic sclerosis diagnosis and an increased prevalence of the diffuse cutaneous subset, renal crisis, and digital ulcers. Women demonstrated a significantly higher percentage of sicca syndrome, serum antinuclear antibodies, antiextractable nuclear antigens, anti-La/SSB, and anticentromere protein. [33] The peak onset occurs in individuals aged 30-50 years. Numerous cases occur in children, however, as well as in very old individuals. Previous Next: PrognosisSurvival in patients with diffuse cutaneous disease has improved significantly; currently, the 5-year survival is estimated to be about 80%. Five-year survival in patients with limited cutaneous disease is approximately 90%. Factors associated with a more severe prognosis are as follows:
ComplicationsComplications of systemic sclerosis include the following:
Frerix and colleagues have proposed that osteonecrosis of the lunate bone (Kienböck disease), while very rare in the general population, may be a frequent manifestation of systemic sclerosis, and may be linked to vasculopathy from the disorder. [34] Lunate osteonecrosis manifests as pain and stiffness in the affected wrist and decreased grip strength in the hand. A cross-sectional study that included 90 women with systemic sclerosis and 90 healthy controls aged 18–70 years documented a high prevalence of impaired pelvic floor function and sexual function in women with systemic sclerosis. The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction was 73% in systemic sclerosis patients versus 31% in the controls. Impaired sexual function correlated with higher disease activity, the presence of dyspnea and interstitial lung disease, increased systemic inflammation, reduced physical activity, functional disability, more severe depression, more pronounced fatigue, and impaired quality of life. [35] Mortality/morbiditySystemic sclerosis has the highest case-specific mortality among the systemic autoimmune diseases. Pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis (interstitial lung disease), and scleroderma renal crisis are the most frequent causes of mortality. [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43] Survival has improved in recent decades and correlates best with the clinical disease subtype (diffuse cutaneous vs limited cutaneous) and with the extent of organ involvement. Five-year survival among patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis has improved significantly, from 69% in the 1990–1993 cohort to 84% in the 2000–2003 cohort. Five-year survival among the patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis remained very high and unchanged for the same periods (93% and 91%, respectively). For patients with scleroderma renal crisis, 1-year mortality is 20%-30% and 5-year mortality is 30%-50%; for normotensive scleroderma renal crisis, which accounts for about 10% of all cases, 1-year mortality is 60%. Half of patients with scleroderma require hemodialysis, and renal function recovers spontaneoulsy in only one quarter of those. Predictors of worse outcome in patients with scleroderma renal crisis include the following [44] :
Mortality associated with scleroderma renal crisis has declined significantly in recent decades. In contrast, pulmonary involvement (interstitial lung disease and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension) has become the most common cause of death in patients with systemic sclerosis. Previous Next: Patient EducationTo minimize the risk of Raynaud phenomenon flare, instruct patients to maintain their core body temperature; strongly encourage smoking cessation in patients who smoke, and advise all patients to avoid exposure to cigarette smoke. Instruct the patient to avoid digital or skin trauma and prolonged cold exposure. For patient education information, see Scleroderma. Previous Clinical Presentation
References
Media Gallery
of 11 Tables
Table. Table 1: ACR/EULAR Revised Systemic Sclerosis Classification Criteria Item Sub-item(s) Score* Skin thickening of the fingers of both hands extending proximally to the metacarpophalangeal joints (presence of this criterion is sufficient criterion for SSc classification) None 9 Skin thickening of the fingers (count the higher score only) Puffy fingers 2 Sclerodactyly (distal to the metacarpophalangeal joints but proximal to the proximal interphalangeal joints) 4 Fingertip lesions (count the higher score only) Digital tip ulcers 2 Fingertip pitting scars 3 Telangiectasia None 2 Abnormal nailfold capillaries None 2 Pulmonary arterial hypertension and/or interstitial lung disease (maximum score is 2) Pulmonary arterial hypertension 2 Interstitial lung disease 2 Raynaud phenomenon None 3 Systemic sclerosis–related autoantibodies (maximum score is 3) Anticentromere 3 Anti–topoisomerase I 3 Anti–RNA polymerase III 3 *The total score is determined by adding the maximum score in each category. Patients with a total score equal to or greater than 9 are classified as having definite systemic sclerosis (modified from van den Hoogen F, Khanna D, Fransen J, et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. Nov 2013;65(11):2737-47. [1] ) Back to List Contributor Information and Disclosures Author Sergio A Jimenez, MD, MACR, FACP, FRCP(UK Hon) Professor and Director, The Scleroderma Center; Co-Director, Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine; Director, Division of Connective Tissue Diseases, Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University Coauthor(s) Fabian A Mendoza, MD, FACR Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Jefferson Medical College and Jefferson Institute of Molecular Medicine; Associate Director of The Scleroderma Center, Director of Scleroderma Program, Thomas Jefferson University Specialty Editor Board Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference Elliot Goldberg, MD Dean of the Western Pennsylvania Clinical Campus, Professor, Department of Medicine, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Chief Editor Herbert S Diamond, MD Visiting Professor of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center; Chairman Emeritus, Department of Internal Medicine, Western Pennsylvania Hospital Additional Contributors John Varga, MD Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Acknowledgements Patrick M Cronin, DO, FACR Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Pennsylvania Hospital Patrick M Cronin, DO, FACR is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Rheumatology, American Osteopathic Association, and Pennsylvania Medical Society Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Andrew S Koenig, DO Consulting Staff, Division of Rheumatology, Rancoccas Hospital Andrew S Koenig, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American College of Rheumatology, and American Osteopathic Association Disclosure: Nothing to disclose. Marie Spevak O'Brien, DO Assistant Clinical Professor of Medicine, Arthritis and Rheumatology, Lehigh Valley Physician Group Marie Spevak O'Brien, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Physicians, American College of Rheumatology, American Medical Association, American Osteopathic Association, International Society for Clinical Densitometry, and Pennsylvania Medical Society What parts of the body does scleroderma affect?Localized scleroderma only affects the skin and the structures directly under the skin. Systemic scleroderma, also called systemic sclerosis, affects many systems in the body. This is the more serious type of scleroderma and can damage your blood vessels and internal organs, such as the heart, lungs, and kidneys.
What is the most common visceral manifestation of patients with systemic scleroderma?Gastrointestinal manifestations
Esophageal dysfunction is the most frequent visceral disturbance and occurs in most patients. Dysphagia. The condition results from impeded transport of liquids, solids, or both from the pharynx to the stomach.
What causes scleroderma flare ups?The immune system and vascular system as well as connective tissue metabolism are known to play some role in the disease process. Researchers believe that several factors interact to produce scleroderma. These include abnormal immune activity, potential environmental triggers, and genetic makeup.
What is the pathophysiology of scleroderma?The clinical and pathologic manifestations result from three distinct processes: 1) severe fibroproliferative vascular lesions of small arteries and arterioles, 2) excessive and often progressive deposition of collagen and other extracellular matrix (ECM) macromolecules in skin and various internal organs, and 3) ...
|