How many members are there in the audit committee?

UK listed boards combine executives and independent, non-executive directors (NEDs). The Code recommends that at least half the board, excluding the chairman, comprises independent NEDs. The Code also recommends that there is a clear division of responsibilities at the head of the company and so practically all boards separate the roles of chairman and chief executive.  Most boards maintain an audit committee, a remuneration (compensation) committee and a nomination committee. Other committees that might be constituted by the board are a risk committee, sustainability committee and disclosure committee (in general the disclosure committee is formed to deal with the Market Abuse Regulation).

The Audit Committee

UK implementation of the European Union's Statutory Audit Directive, in the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules, imposes a requirement, for all companies whose securities are traded on a regulated market in the EU to have an audit committee (or equivalent body). The Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules include details of the minimum functions of the audit committee. The Code also includes provisions on the composition and role of the audit committee and these are fully compatible with the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules requirements. The Code recommends audit committees be comprised of at least three members, all of whom should be independent non-executive directors and one of whom should have recent and relevant financial experience. The chairman cannot be a member of the Audit Committee, even for companies outside the FTSE 350. The Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules expect the audit committee to have at least one member with experience in accounting and/or auditing, but indicate that this requirement can be met by meeting the Code composition requirements for recent and relevant financial experience. There is also a requirement for the audit committee as a whole to have competence relevant to the sector in which the company operates Under the Competition & Markets Authority’s final Order (relevant to FTSE 350 Companies), the audit committee has increased responsibilities in relation to supervision of the external audit relationship, which largely puts existing best practice on a statutory basis.   

The Remuneration Committee

Executive pay remains a topic of considerable debate in the UK. Investors keep close watch on pay schemes that exceed accepted norms.  Share option schemes are common, as are restricted share unit schemes. Service contracts for chief executives are also watched to ensure that payouts on departure do not exceed one year's remuneration.  Some investors require pension contributions to be capped at a similar percentage to the company's workforce.  Shareholders have sought to increase their power over remuneration through binding votes. In August 2013, new Directors' remuneration regulations were approved by Parliament and the remuneration policy report is also now subject to a binding shareholder vote.  As a result, the remuneration committee is being made more accountable to shareholders for directors’ remuneration. Under the 2018 Code, before appointment the chair of the remuneration committee should have served on a remuneration committee for at least 12 months

The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 require quoted and UK registered companies with more than 250 UK employees to annually publish and justify the pay difference between chief executives and their staff – known as ‘pay ratios’. Such companies also need to illustrate the effect of future share price increases on executive pay outcomes to inform shareholders when voting on long-term incentive plans.

The Nomination Committee

Together with the audit and remuneration committees, the nomination committee makes up the three standing committees of a listed company’s board of directors.  This committee is charged with the critical role of enhancing the quality of nominees to the board through effective succession planning analysis, setting policy around board appointments, including diversity, and specifying descriptions of the role and capabilities required for board appointments in light of existing skills and experience of current board members.  The nomination committee is receiving more attention due to shareholders and regulators questioning the integrity of board appointments from a quality and diversity perspective.  

Overview

The primary purpose of a company’s audit committee is to provide oversight of the financial reporting process, the audit process, the company’s system of internal controls and compliance with laws and regulations.

The audit committee can expect to review significant accounting and reporting issues and recent professional and regulatory pronouncements to understand the potential impact on financial statements. An understanding of how management develops internal interim financial information is necessary to assess whether reports are complete and accurate.

The committee reviews the results of an audit with management and external auditors, including matters required to be communicated to the committee under generally accepted auditing standards. Controls over financial reporting, information technology security and operational matters fall under the purview of the committee. 

The audit committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the auditor. As such, CPAs report directly to the audit committee, not management.

Audit committees meet separately with external auditors to discuss matters that the committee or auditors believe should be discussed privately. The committee also reviews proposed audit approaches and handle coordination of the audit effort with internal audit staff.  When an internal audit function exists, the committee will review and approve the audit plan, review staffing and organization of the function, and meet with internal auditors and management on a periodic basis to discuss matters of concern that may arise.

Audit committees must have authority over their own budgets and over external auditors. It is through these protections that investors will come to trust the financial reports released by companies.

While boards should seek members who can provide a diverse range of competent perspectives based on their experience and expertise, it is nevertheless imperative that board members are knowledgeable and conversant in the language of finance and accounting. This need is particularly acute for the audit committee.

Regulation

Effective April 2003 the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted a rule directing the national securities exchanges and national securities associations to prohibit the listing of any security of an issuer that is not in compliance with the audit committee requirements mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The requirements relate to:

  • The independence of audit committee members;
  • the audit committee's responsibility to select and oversee the issuer's independent accountant;
  • Procedures for handling complaints regarding the issuer's accounting practices;
  • The authority of the audit committee to engage advisors;
  • Funding for the independent auditor and any outside advisors engaged by the audit committee.

The rule implements the requirements of Section 10A(m)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Under the rule, listed issuers must be in compliance with the new listing rules by the earlier of their first annual shareholders meeting after January 15, 2004, or October 31, 2004. Foreign private issuers and small business issuers will have additional time to comply.

In July 2015, the SEC voted to publish a concept release seeking public comment on audit committee disclosure requirements, focusing on the committee’s oversight of independent auditors.  The SEC is interested in receiving information about the audit committee and auditor relationship and whether improvements can be made to enhance the information provided to investors about the audit committee’s responsibilities and activities.  

“Effective audit committee oversight is essential to investor protection and the functioning of our capital markets,” said then SEC Chair Mary Jo White.  “The way audit committees exercise their oversight of independent auditors has evolved and it is important to evaluate whether investors have the information they need to make informed decisions.”   

In addition to seeking views about audit committee disclosures, the concept release invited comment on whether SEC disclosure requirements should be refined to provide more insight into the information the audit committee used and the factors it considered in overseeing the independent auditor.  This includes considerations related to the process for appointing or retaining the auditor and the qualifications of the auditor and certain members of the engagement team, among others.

CFA Institute Viewpoint

All audit committee members should be independent. Independence is needed to prevent insiders from influencing the work and oversight of the committee and the work of the external auditors. Companies operating in specialist niches should have to meet the same audit committee disclosure and structure requirements as companies operating in more traditional markets. This is because companies in specialist niches are affected by the same conflicts and potential for accounting fraud as more traditional companies and therefore should meet the same independence and financial experts’ requirements as traditional companies. In cases where this is not feasible they should disclose such deficiencies to investors to alert them to the possibility of management influence on the audit committee.

Audit firms should use auditors with forensic audit backgrounds to assist in the audits and for training audit staff in identifying cases of intentional accounting errors and irregularities. Auditors should be able to identify earnings management or accounting irregularities, and thus, deter such activity.

What are the members of audit committee?

An audit committee is made of members of a company's board of directors and oversees its financial statements and reporting. Per regulation, the audit committee must include outside board members as well as those well-versed in finance or accounting in order to produce honest and accurate reports.

How many audits are there?

There are three main types of audits: external audits, internal audits, and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audits. External audits are commonly performed by Certified Public Accounting (CPA) firms and result in an auditor's opinion which is included in the audit report.

How many are the required minimum number of the members of the audit committee?

The Audit Committee shall comprise of at least three directors, each of whom are independent of the Company and Management.

How many auditors are there in India?

Even though India has more than 2,300 statutory auditors, most large companies go for network firms of Deloitte, KPMG, PwC and EY.